User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux) AppleWebKit/534.34 (KHTML, like Gecko) QtCarBrowser Safari/534.34
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-325.php
Model S Browser 0.0Linux unknownunknown 534.34TeslaModel SCar Entertainment System Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Model S Browser WebKit Linux TeslaModel SCar Entertainment System0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 534.34closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux TeslaModel Scar browser0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QtCarBrowser 1closeLinux TeslaModel Scloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.16902 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QTCarBrowser WebKit 534.34Linux Tesla Model S Dashboardcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.34 TeslaModel Scarcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:24 | by ThaDafinser