User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.3; U; Series60/3.2 NokiaN96-3/3.00; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1;) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/413
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series60.yaml
Series60 3.2Webkit 413NokiaN96-3mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.05901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 413closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.3NokiaN96-3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.2WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 3.2NokiaN96smartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 3.00;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.2closeSymbian OS 9.3NokiaN96-3closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 3.2closeSymbianOS 9.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 413NokiaOS NokiaNokia N96-3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 413Series60 3.2NokiaN96mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.3NokiaN96-3Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:24 | by ThaDafinser