User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.2pre) Gecko/2008071405 GranParadiso/3.0.2pre
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox GranParadiso (3.0.2)Windows XPGecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.9Gecko 1.9WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.08701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (GranParadiso) 3.0.2precloseWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox GranParadiso (3.0Gecko Windows XPdesktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
GranParadiso 3.0.2closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
GranParadiso 3.0.2precloseWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.9.0.2preGecko 2008071405Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Gran Paradiso 3.0.2Gecko 1.9.0Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:24 | by ThaDafinser