User agent detail

Locubot (compatible; Googlebot; msnbot)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
yesLocubotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesLocubotBot/Crawler0.005 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Googlebot msnbotcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesclose0.19902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBingBotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotCrawler0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Googlebot closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:24 | by ThaDafinser