User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/4.6; Linux) KHTML/4.6.5 (like Gecko) Mageia/4.6.5-1.7.mga1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Konqueror 4.6Mageia 1KHTML 4.6.5desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 4.6KHTML 4.6Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.6closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.6KHTML GNU/Linux desktop0.015 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.6;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.6closeMageia closeclosecloseclose0.02 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.6 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.6KHTML 4.6.5Mageia 1desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:24 | by ThaDafinser