User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; ru; IQ430 Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1 UCBrowser/9.2.0.419 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.2Android 4.1unknown FlyEvokeMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2WebKit Android 4.1FlyEvokeMobile Phoneyesyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.1.1FlyIQ430mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2WebKit Android 4.1yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.0closeAndroid 4.1.1FlyIQ430closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.0.419WebKit 528.5Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Webkit 528.5Android 4.1.1FlyIQ430 Evokemobile:smartyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:23 | by ThaDafinser