User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (OpenBSD 3.3 i386; U) Opera 6.03 [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
OpenBSD 3.3 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 6.03closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 6.03closeBSD 3.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.20102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 6.03Presto OpenBSD 3.3desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 6.03closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.3closeOpenBSD 3.3closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 6.03closeOpenBSD 3.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.04501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 6.3 OpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.50605 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 6.03 OpenBSD 3.3desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 6.03closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:23 | by ThaDafinser