User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; SGP321 Build/10.5.A.0.230) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.141 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Chrome 35.0Android 4.4unknown SonyXperia Tablet Z LTETabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.4SonyXperia Tablet Z LTETabletyesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.4SonyXperia Tablet Ztabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.4.2SonySGP321closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.141WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.4.2SonyXperia Tablet Ztabletyescloseclose0.042 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 35closeAndroid 4.4SonySGP321Tabletyesyescloseclose0.044 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:23 | by ThaDafinser