User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; Lenovo A328 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.96 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-732.php
Chrome 41.0Android 4.4unknown LenovoA328Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoA328Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.96closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 41.0.2272.96closeAndroid 4.4.2LenovoA328mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 41.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoA328smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.96closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 41.0.2272closeAndroid 4.4.2LenovoA328closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.96WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 41Blink Android 4.4.2LenovoA328mobile:smartyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.96closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 4.4LenovoA328Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06701 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:23 | by ThaDafinser