User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Series80/2.0 Nokia9300i Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia9300i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.0closeSymbian OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 5.0Trident Symbian Nokia9300ismartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia 9300close Nokia9300icloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.0Trident NokiaOS NokiaNokia 9300icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series80 2.0Nokia9300i Profilemobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia9300iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:22 | by ThaDafinser