User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux armv7l; U; CE-HTML/1.0 NETTV/4.1.1; xx) Presto/2.10.287 Version/12.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/philips.yaml
Opera Devices 3.2 Presto 2.10.287PhilipsNet TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.00Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.00closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.22102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.00Presto GNU/Linux PhilipsNetTV Seriestv0.014 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.0Presto 2.10.287Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.2Presto 2.10.287 PhilipsNet TVtelevisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:22 | by ThaDafinser