User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Symbian; U; S60 V3; Pt-BR; SamsungI8510) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.9.0.277 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaS60 V3 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.9U2 SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeSymbian OS mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.9 Symbian OS Series 60 V3NokiaMobilefeature phoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.9.0closeSymbian OS NokiaS60 V3closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.09701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.9.0.277 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.9Gecko Series60 3SamsungINNOV8mobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:21 | by ThaDafinser