User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/534.34 (KHTML, like Gecko) Qt/4.8.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
Qt 4.8Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Qt 4.8WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Qt Library v4.8 based browser WebKit 534.34Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Qt 4.8.2Webkit 534.34Linux desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:21 | by ThaDafinser