User agent detail

SAMSUNG-SM-B360E Opera/9.80 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/8.0.35840/35.7561; U; xx) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Opera Mini 8.0 Presto 2.8.119SamsungSM-B360Emobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 8.0Presto 2.8JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 8.0.35840closeJVM SamsungSM-B360Emobile-browseryescloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 8.0Presto SamsungSM-B360Esmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 8.0.35840close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 8.0.35840close SamsungSM-B360Ecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 8.0.35840close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 8.0.35840Presto 2.8.119 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 8.0Presto 2.8.119 SamsungSM-B360Emobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 8.0close SamsungSM-B360EFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:21 | by ThaDafinser