User agent detail

[FBAN/FB4A-AZ;FBAV/2.1;FBDM/{density=3.0,width=1080,height=1920};FBLC/de_DE;FBCR/;FBPN/com.facebook.katana;FBDV/HTC One max;FBSV/4.3;]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCOne max Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Facebook App WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.11601 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Facebook close HTCOne maxmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Facebook 2.1 HTCOne maxphabletyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Facebook 2.1close HTCOne maxcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
HTC One maxcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Facebook HTCOne maxmobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:21 | by ThaDafinser