User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (webOS/HP webOS 2.1.0; U; xx) AppleWebKit/532.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/1.0 Safari/532.2 Pixi/1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-webos.yaml
webOS 2.1Webkit 532.2PalmPixi Plusmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
WebKit/webOS 1.0WebKit webOS PalmPixiMobile Phoneyes0.10801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 1.0closewebOS desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 1.0WebKit webOS PalmPixi 1.1smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 1.0close PalmPixicloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 1.0WebKit 532.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 532.2webOS 2.1PalmPixi Plusmobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 1.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 1.0closewebOS HPFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:20 | by ThaDafinser