User agent detail

CoolPad8020+_CMCC_TD/1.08 Linux/2.6.35 Android/2.3.5 Release/03.29.2012 Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/533.1 Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1; 360 Aphone Browser (6.4.3)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-360.yaml
Qihoo 360 Browser 6.4.3Android 2.3.5Webkit 533.1Coolpad8020mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 4.0closeAndroid Coolpad8020+mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
360 Phone Browser 6.4WebKit Android 2.3Coolpad8020smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.5closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.07201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.53305 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Qihoo 360 Browser 6.4.3Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.5Coolpad8020mobile:smartyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
360 Browser closeAndroid 2.3Coolpad8020+Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:19 | by ThaDafinser