User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; Galaxy Nexus Build/IMM76B) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; Google-Publisher-Plugin) Chrome/27.0.1453 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/Parser/fixtures/bots.yml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 27.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 27.0.1453closeAndroid 4.0.4SamsungGalaxy Nexusmobile-browseryescloseclose0.23702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 27.0.1453closeAndroid 4.0.4SamsungGalaxy Nexuscloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 27.0.1453WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4SamsungGalaxy Nexuscloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 27Blink Android 4.0.4SamsungGalaxy Nexusmobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.0SamsungGalaxy NexusSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:19 | by ThaDafinser