User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SCH-S579/S579DJ19;U;REX/3.0;BREW/3.1.5;Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1;240*320;CTC/2.0) POLARIS/6.2.WEB
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-brew.yaml
Polaris 6.2Brew 3.1.5 SamsungSCH-S579mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Polaris 6.2.closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Polaris 6.2 Brew 3.1SamsungSCH-S579smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Polaris 6.2closeBREW 3.1.5closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Polaris 6.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Polaris 6.2 Brew 3.1.5SamsungSCH-S579mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:19 | by ThaDafinser