User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Maemo; Linux armv7l; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110811 Firefox/6.0 Fennec/6.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-maemo.yaml
Firefox Mobile Fennec 6.0Maemo Gecko 6.0mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Fennec 6.0Gecko 2.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Firefox 6.0closeLinux NokiaGeneric Maemo with Fennecmobile-browseryescloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Fennec 6.0Gecko Maemo yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 6.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox Mobile 6.0closeMaemo closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Fennec 6.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Fennec 6.0Gecko 20110811Maemo closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Mobile Fennec 6.0Gecko 6.0Maemo mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 17.0closeMaemo NokiaGeneric Maemo with FennecFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:19 | by ThaDafinser