User agent detail

Argus/2.8.65 CFNetwork/609 Darwin/13.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
CFNetwork Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CFNetwork WebKit iOS 6.0AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Argus 2.8.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeiOS 6.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
iOS 6.0yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork closeiOS 6.0Applecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
iOS 6.0mobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS 6.0AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:19 | by ThaDafinser