User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; TI320-DU TV Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.80 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/google.yaml
Chrome 29Google TV Blink 537.36LGU+ tv Gtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.80closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.28403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.2tabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.80closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 29.0.1547closeAndroid 4.2.2TI320-DU TVcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.80WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 29Blink Google TV LGU+ tv Gtelevisioncloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.80closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.10501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:18 | by ThaDafinser