User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (S60V3; U; en-in; NOKIAE55-1)/UC Browser8.2.0.132/28/405/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaE55-1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2 Symbian OS Series 60 V3NokiaE55-1smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser UCcloseNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.0closeSymbian OS NokiaE55-1closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.0.132 NokiaMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2Gecko Series60 3NokiaE55mobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:17 | by ThaDafinser