User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) WhiteHat Aviator/33.0.1750.117 Chrome/33.0.1750.117 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-281.php
WhiteHat Aviator 33.0WinVista 6.0unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
WhiteHat Aviator 33.0Blink WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.117closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.117closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 33.0Blink Windows Vistadesktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.117closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 33.0.1750closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.117closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.117WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Aviator 33Blink Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.117closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 33.0.1750.152closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:17 | by ThaDafinser