User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_5) AppleWebKit/600.1.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.2 Safari/537.85.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-447.php
Safari 6.2MacOSX 10.8unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 6.2WebKit MacOSX 10.8AppleMacintoshDesktop0.12501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 6.2closeOS X 10.8.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.36504 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 6.2WebKit Mac 10.8desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.2closeOS X 10.8.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 6.2closeMac OS X 10.8.5closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.2closeOS X 10.8.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 6.2WebKit 600.1.17Mac OS X 10.8.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 6.2Webkit 600.1.17OS X Mountain Lion 10.8desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 6.0.5closeMac OS X 10.8.4Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:17 | by ThaDafinser