User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; CPU iPhone OS 5_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
Apple Mail 5.1iOS 5.1unknown AppleiPod TouchMobile Deviceyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Apple Mail 5.1WebKit iOS 5.1AppleiPod TouchMobile Deviceyesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.46closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 5.1.1AppleiPod Touchmobile-browseryescloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 5.1AppleiPod Touchportable media playeryes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 5.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView closeiOS 5.1.1AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 5.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.09601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 534.46iOS 5.1.1AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.46iOS 5.1.1AppleiPod touchmediayescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 5.1.1closeiOS 5.1.1AppleiPod TouchOther Mobileyesyescloseclose0.08101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:17 | by ThaDafinser