User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Unix; xx) AppleWebKit/537.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/24.0.1295.0 Safari/537.15 Surf/0.6.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-unix.yaml
Surf 0.6.1Unix Webkit 537.15desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 24.0.1295.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 24.0.1295.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 24.0WebKit 0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 24.0.1295.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 24.0.1295close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Surf 0.6.1closeUnix closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 24.0.1295.0WebKit 537.15a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Surf 0.6.1Webkit 537.15Unix desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 24.0.1295.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 24.0.1312.52closeUnknown Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:17 | by ThaDafinser