User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; it-ch; ARNOVA 90 G4 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Android Browser Android 4.2.2WebKit Arnova90 G4tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.11301 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2Arnova90 G4mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2Arnova90 G4tabletyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2Arnova90 G4closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.14501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.64606 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2ArchosArnova 90 G4tabletyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Arnova90 G4Tabletyesyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:16 | by ThaDafinser