User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (OpenBSD i386) AppleWebKit/538.1+ (KHTML, like Gecko) WebKitGTK+/2.2.3 luakit/0d5f4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
LuaKit OpenBSD Webkit 538.1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 538.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
OpenBSD desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
LuaKit closeOpenBSD closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 538.1OpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LuaKit Webkit 538.1OpenBSD closeclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:16 | by ThaDafinser