User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; CloudFlare-AlwaysOnline/1.0; +http://www.cloudflare.com/always-online) AppleWebKit/534.34
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-500.php
yesCloudFlare AlwaysOnlineBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesCloudFlare AlwaysOnlineBot/Crawler0.04701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesCloudFare Always Onlineclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesCloudFlare Always OnlineSite Monitor0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534.34 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesCloudFare Always Onlineclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:15 | by ThaDafinser