User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; de-de; ONE TOUCH EVO8HD Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.2 Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AlcatelOne Touch EVO8HD Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.2WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2AlcatelOne Touch EVO8HDtabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.2closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2AlcatelOne Touch EVO8HDcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.2WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2AlcatelOne Touch Evo 8 HDtabletyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.06001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:15 | by ThaDafinser