User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows CE 7.0) AppleWebKit/537.13.0.1379224625+ (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsce.yaml
Windows CE 7.0Webkit 537.13.0.1379224625mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 537.13.0.1379224625closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Apple Mail closeWindows 7.0email-clientcloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows CE yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
AppleMail 537.13.0closeWindows CE closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows CE 7.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.15802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 537.13.0.1379224625Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.13.0.1379224625Windows CE 7.0mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:14 | by ThaDafinser