User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (S60; SymbOS; Opera Mobi/SYB-1204232256; U; en-GB) Presto/2.10.254 Version/12.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Symbian OS Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 12.00Presto 2.10SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 12.00closeSymbian OS OperaOpera for Series 60mobile-browseryescloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 12.00Presto Symbian OS Series 60 yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.00closeSymbOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 12.0closeSymbian OS closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile 12.00closeSymbOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.044 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.0Presto 2.10.254Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 12.00Presto 2.10.254Series60 mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.00closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile 12.00close OperaOpera for Series 60Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:14 | by ThaDafinser