User agent detail

Epic Empire/1.80 pgid=454af7cb350c2a1b tag=454af7cb350c2a1b cv=180011 hw=ASUS ME371MG; ME371MG; gzip; JavaHttp
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AsusME371MG Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Epic closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Java AsusFonepadphabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close AsusME371MGcloseclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.055 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
No result found
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:14 | by ThaDafinser