User agent detail

HTCP3600-Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC; 240x320)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Mobile Internet Explorer 4.0.1Windows Mobile HTCTrinitymobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Pocket PC WinCE Mobile Phoneyes0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 4.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 4.01closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 4.01Trident Windows CE HTCP3600-Mozillasmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 4.1closeWindows CE HTCP3600closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 4.1Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 4.0.1 Windows Mobile HTCTrinitymobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile HTCP3600Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:14 | by ThaDafinser