User agent detail

SAMSUNG-S8300/1.0 SHP/VPP/R5 NetFront/3.5 NexPlayer/2.9.1 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungS8300 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.5NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-S8300 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.5closeJVM SamsungGT-S8300mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NexPlayer 2.9 SamsungS8300smartphoneyes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.5close SamsungS8300closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.5close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.5 SamsungS8300mobile:featureyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.5close SamsungGT-S8300Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:13 | by ThaDafinser