User agent detail

LGE-AX260/1.0 UP.Browser/6.2.3.8 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGAX260 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA LGAX260Mobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LGE-AX260 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.8close LGAX260mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 LGAX260smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close LGAX260closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.8 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47205 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 LGAX260mobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGAX260Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:13 | by ThaDafinser