User agent detail

MOZILLA/SMB3(Z105)/SAMSUNG-NOURLCMP-NOMIME
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungNOURLCMP-NOMIME Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close SamsungNOURLCMP-NOMIMEmobile-browseryescloseclose0.27703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SamsungNOURLCMP-NOMIMEsmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla SMB3(Z105)/SAMSUNG-NOURLCMP-NOMIMEclose closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungNOURLCMP-NOMIMEcloseclosecloseclose0.017 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SamsungNOURLCMP-NOMIMEmobile:featureyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:12 | by ThaDafinser