User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Phoenix 2 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.108 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 42.0Android 4.2unknown FlyIQ4410i Quad Phoenix 2Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 42.0Blink Android 4.2FlyIQ4410i Quad Phoenix 2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.076 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.108closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311.108closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.33703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 42.0Blink Android 4.2smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.108closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311closeAndroid 4.2.2Phoenix 2closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Phoenix 2closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Phoenix WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 42Blink Android 4.2.2Phoenix 2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.09701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.108closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:12 | by ThaDafinser