User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1.99; Build/MRA23D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/44.0.2403.106 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
GenericSmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 44.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.106closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403.106closeAndroid 5.1.99LGP880mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 44.0Blink Android 5.1smartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.106closeAndroid 5.1.99closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403closeAndroid 5.1.99closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.1.99closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.106WebKit 537.36Android 5.1.99closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 44Blink Android Mmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.106closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 5.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.058 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:11 | by ThaDafinser