User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips; Opera TV Store/6162; HbbTV/1.2.1 (; Altech UEC; PVR9600; ; ; )) Presto/2.12.407 Version/12.51 Model/AltechMultimedia-TestingDevice
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Opera 12.51GNU/Linux Presto 2.12.407Altech UECPVR9600tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.51closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.80closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.24302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.51Presto GNU/Linux Altech UECPVR9600tv0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.51 Model/AltechMultimedia-TestingDevicecloseLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.2.1closeLinux Altech UECPVR9600closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.51closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.13301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.51Presto 2.12.407Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.407 Altech UECPVR9600televisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.51closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:11 | by ThaDafinser