User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; NOKIALumia900; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/1.8.0.50.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsphone.yaml
Nokia Xpress 1.8.0Windows Phone Gecko NokiaLumia 900mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.12 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.20502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Ovi Browser 1.8Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 NokiaLumia900smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser MIDcloseNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Ovi Browser 1.8.0closeNokia Series 40 NokiaLumia900closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser 1.8.0.50.5Gecko 20100401Symbian Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress 1.8.0Gecko Windows Phone NokiaLumia 900mobile:smartyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 1.8closeNokia Series 40 NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:10 | by ThaDafinser