User agent detail

Opera/6.12 (OpenBSD 3.7; U) [en]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Opera 6.12OpenBSD 3.7 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 6.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 6.12closeBSD 3.7desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 6.12Presto OpenBSD 3.7desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 6.12closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 6.12closeOpenBSD 3.7closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 6.12closeOpenBSD 3.7closecloseclosecloseclose0.043 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 6.12 OpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 6.12 OpenBSD 3.7desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 6.12closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:10 | by ThaDafinser