User agent detail

MOZILLA/40 (COMPATIBLE MSIE 60 WINDOWS CE PPC) ASUS-GALAXYII/10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AsusGALAXYII Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Edge 60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 60closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 60Trident Windows CE AsusGALAXYIIsmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 60closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close AsusGALAXYIIcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MSIE close closecloseclosecloseclose0.043 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 60Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 60 Windows Mobile AsusGalaxy IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:10 | by ThaDafinser