User agent detail

LG Browser/5.0.0 InettvBrowser/2.2 (00E091;LGE3D2012M;01;00)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/lg.yaml
LG Browser 5.0 LGNetCast TV 2012television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
LG Browser 5.0.0close media-playercloseclose0.19902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
LGBrowsersmartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGE3D2012Mcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LG Browser 5.0 LGNetCast TV 2012televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
InternetTVBrowser closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:10 | by ThaDafinser