User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.6+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Chromium/17.0.963.56 Chrome/17.0.963.56 Safari/537.6+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-chromium.yaml
Chromium 17.0.963.56Windows 7Webkit 537.6desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 17.0.963.56closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 17.0WebKit Windows 7desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 17.0.963closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 17.0.963.56WebKit 537.6Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47205 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 17.0.963.56Webkit 537.6Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 17.0.963.56closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 17.0.963.26closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:10 | by ThaDafinser