User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1.1; LG-H900/H90010d Build/LMY47V) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/38.0.2125.102 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-lg.yaml
LG Browser Android 5.1.1Blink 537.36LGV10mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android WebView 4.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 5.1.1GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.27003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 38.0Blink Android 5.1LGH900smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeAndroid 5.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 38.0.2125closeAndroid 5.1.1LGH900closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 38.0.2125.102WebKit 537.36Android 5.1.1LGLGH900closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.50005 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LG Browser Blink Android 5.1.1LGV10mobile:smartyescloseclose0.032 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 38.0.2125.102closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 38closeAndroid 5.1LGH900Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.046 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:09 | by ThaDafinser