User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_11_1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Wire/2.3.2553 Chrome/45.0.2454.85 Electron/0.35.2 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-879.php
Wire App 2.3MacOSX 10.11unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Wire App 2.3Blink MacOSX 10.11AppleMacintoshDesktop0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.85closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.85closeOS X 10.11.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 45.0Blink Mac 10.11desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.85closeOS X 10.11.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 45.0.2454closeMac OS X 10.11.1closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.85closeOS X 10.11.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.85WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.11.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Electron 0.35.2Blink OS X El Capitan 10.11desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.85closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:09 | by ThaDafinser