User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.1-update1; en-us ; MID7015 Build/ECLAIR) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1/UCBrowser/8.3.0.143/145/444
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
CobyKyrosMID7015 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.3WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.054 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.1-update1GenericAndroid 2.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.3WebKit Android 2.1Coby KyrosMID7015tabletyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.3.0closeAndroid 2.1.0CobyKyrosMID7015closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.1-update1closecloseclosecloseclose0.055 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.3.0.143WebKit 533.1Android 2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.3Webkit 533.1Android 2.0CobyKyros MID7015tabletyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:09 | by ThaDafinser