User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-gb; i-mobile IE 6010 Build/Donut) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
imobileIE 6010 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 3.1WebKit Android 1.6Mobile Phoneyesyes0.052 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 1.6GenericAndroid 1.6mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6010Trident Android 1.6i-mobileIE 6010smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 1.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 1.6closeAndroid 1.6imobileIE 6010closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 1.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.07001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 3.1.2WebKit 528.5Android 1.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.59706 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 528.5Android 1.6i-mobile IE 6010mobile:smartyescloseclose0.09601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 1.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.042 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:08 | by ThaDafinser